Global ecommerce sales are on pace to top $7.9 trillion in 2026, and almost none of the brands driving that number are running every function in-house. It is now normal, not exceptional, for an eCommerce or DTC brand to have a paid media agency, a separate retention or lifecycle partner, an Amazon or marketplace specialist, and an SEO or content shop all working at the same time. The tactical execution of ecommerce marketing has become genuinely outsourced.
That shift raises a question we hear constantly from clients building out their team: if the agencies are handling the day-to-day execution, what exactly does the internal hire need to do? The answer, consistently, is that agencies are built to execute within their own channel, not to own the business outcome across all of them. Someone inside the company still has to decide what to outsource, hold each partner accountable to the same number, and catch it when three agencies are quietly optimizing for three different goals.
The Modern eCommerce Agency Stack
Most growing eCommerce and DTC brands are now piecing together agency support across a handful of recurring categories rather than hiring one generalist shop for everything. Full-stack agencies exist, but even the strongest full-stack partners tend to have real depth in two or three disciplines and a thinner bench everywhere else. Here is how that stack typically breaks down, along with agencies that are frequently cited across the space for each function.
| Function | What It Covers | Agencies Commonly Cited |
|---|---|---|
| Paid Media & Performance Creative | Meta, Google, and TikTok media buying paired with high-volume creative testing | Common Thread Collective, Power Digital, Structured |
| Retail Media & Marketplace | Amazon, Walmart Connect, Target Roundel, and TikTok Shop management | Tinuiti and other Amazon-focused specialists |
| Retention & Lifecycle | Email and SMS flows, segmentation, and Klaviyo-based revenue programs | Boutique lifecycle and Klaviyo partner agencies |
| SEO, Content & AEO | Technical SEO, organic content, and visibility in AI search and shopping tools | Inflow and other SEO-first specialists |
| Outsourced CMO / Full-Stack | A la carte access to multiple disciplines without a full annual retainer | Hawke Media |
| Analytics & Measurement | Incrementality testing and unified reporting across every paid channel | WITHIN |
Why Outsourced Execution Raises the Stakes on the Internal Hire
1. Agencies Optimize Their Channel, Not Your Whole Business
A strong paid media agency is judged on paid media performance. A strong retention agency is judged on email and SMS revenue. Neither one is positioned, or incentivized, to notice that the retention flows are cannibalizing paid conversions, or that a marketplace push is quietly training customers to wait for Amazon discounts instead of buying direct. That kind of cross-channel judgment has to sit with someone internal who can see the whole P&L, not just one line of it.
2. Without an Internal Owner, Agency Sprawl Becomes Its Own Cost Center
It is common for a brand to accumulate four or five specialized agency relationships over a couple of years without anyone ever stepping back to ask whether all five are still needed, whether their reporting even uses the same definitions, or whether two of them are unknowingly bidding against each other in the same auction. Left unmanaged, agency sprawl quietly becomes as expensive as an overbuilt internal team, just harder to see on an org chart.
3. The Best Internal Hires Make Agencies More Effective, Not Redundant
The strongest VPs and Directors of eCommerce we place do not view their agency roster as a threat to their own value. They treat it as leverage. A good internal leader briefs agencies with real business context instead of a generic creative brief, sets KPIs the agency cannot grade using only its own platform's numbers, and pushes back on recommendations that optimize for the agency's convenience rather than the brand's margin. That kind of oversight is exactly what separates a brand getting real value from its agency spend from one that is simply paying five invoices a month.
If the honest answer is that no single person owns that view across every agency, that is usually a stronger signal that you need a dedicated internal leader than a signal that you should cut agency spend.
This is also where a lot of interview processes go wrong. It is easy to hire someone who can competently manage one agency relationship, because that is a common enough skill. It is harder to find someone who has actually directed a multi-agency stack, reconciled conflicting reporting, and made the call to fire a partner that was underperforming relative to its cost. That is a different, more senior skill set, and it is worth screening for directly rather than assuming a strong resume implies it.
Agencies execute the plan. The brands growing fastest right now are the ones with one strong internal leader making sure every agency's plan actually adds up to the same number.
Putting It Together
Building out an agency stack is often the right move for tactical execution, but it does not remove the need for a strong internal owner, it makes that hire more important. If you are still working through who inside your organization should hold that responsibility, our post on who should own eCommerce is a useful starting point, and our breakdown of Manager vs. Director vs. VP can help you figure out what level that ownership needs to sit at given your current agency spend and complexity.
If your team is not quite ready for a full-time leader but already has real agency spend that needs direction, a fractional eCommerce leader is often the right bridge. And if the agency stack has grown to the point where leadership is asking whether it is time for a dedicated hire, our post on the signs you need a VP of eCommerce walks through the indicators worth watching for. If you would rather just talk through your specific situation, reach out directly.